I love you!

Hi! Yes! I'm not looking for many URLs at the moment, but if you could do Art for either Shakespeare or Feud that would be nice. I'll reach out on Discord

Hi! /Voyeur just got reclaimed from me sadly I am slightly grieving. I only see NFT for /Ethic though, sorry! I do like /Tumor though so if you'll allow me to shamelessly counter-offer, I could do multiple for it. Thank you!

Really?! Dang. No, I haven't been on there since I left. That's really weird! Has it moved elsewhere? They were working on something called Shrimpcamp before afaik. That might be in. Although Doc is also on Alterspring if you're interested. Either way RIP Tetratto 2025(?)-2026 you will (maybe) be missed.

Tu Magnum Opus me ENCANTA. Lo amo. Debería de estar enmarcado. Velázquez llora ante el talento contemporáneo de tu obrísima. A mí también me encantan las caritas del Atabook... Pero tienes razón, pobre ; supongo que es lo que hay cuando estudias Matemáticas. Las raíces cuadradas me dan mucho miedo. Las RECTAS o todo lo que tenga que representar me dan mucho miedo dios mío cómo odiaba dibujar los puntos de mierda esos... Siempre arriba con la lingüística y la filosofía. Hay que abogar por la abolición de los números 100%. Gracias por el mensaje Kenny!!! ♡

HOLA KENNY SÍ!!! Te ha funcionado!!! Mi nombre es arcoiris!!!

Your self-admission of a little bias against anarchists sparked something in me because I've historically been really passionate about communist-anarchist alliances... That's called anarchism of synthesis, you can look it up if you wish. Just a note I wanted to make. Either way, I'm very Marxist in practice. I'd say I hold Stirnerist values more philosophically, mostly because I think constructing a purely anarcho-egoist society would be impossible (at least directly). A lot of "egoists", specially in online spaces, are simply teenagers attracted by the idea of "pure freedom" that call everything a spook. Which doesn't go against the nature of Egoism at all, I'm just mentioning it because it can make it seem like a reductionist hyperbole of itself. Either way, about communist-anarchist unity -- I'd mentioned it in Tetratto, I think, but as an anarchist I'm actually (was a lot more in the past) affiliated with the Spanish Communist Party (PCE), even though a lot of them are hardcore MLs. I do not mind that because I consider, similarly to Marx, that anti-capitalist revolution will come in stages; the final of which will be anarchism, as Engels, avid collaborator of Marx, actually said himself (yes!): "State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The state is not "abolished". It dies out." The "withering away of the State" is an actual Marxist political concept. Most MLs nowadays seem to ignore it though or at least diminish it a lot (which I somewhat understand as it's posed as a natural process that will happen at the supposed end of a communist revolution, and attaining that revolution is more important to even get that result in the first place, but well) because a lot of them do have very notable biases against anarchists. But that doesn't necessarily need to be that way. To be honest, it's mostly like this online. When I was in the PCE (I still am somewhat, at least in terms of discussion. I'm more involved in regional pursuits and identity now though), nobody really cared. Just be careful not to end up in echochambers about that. Remeber that leftist unity is the only way for leftist liberation and success. Okay? I find just one flaw within your communitarian global notion (as I find within every other ethical notion) and that is "who marks what is ethical and what is not?" for me, any outward demonstration of externally imposed (be it socially or politically) morals and law is inherently oppressive because oftentimes it goes against freedom. It sounds reductionist but that's genuinely my thought! The question lies on whether or not people are something by nature (or not). Are we egoists by nature? Are we altruists by nature? Then let us dictamine society based on that. If we are altruists by nature, abiding by social duties for the sake of the collective does not go against our nature (behaviour, needs, wants, subconscious) and so it does not go against our freedom. Otherwise it does. If everything is truly determinist and we are entirely shaped by outside circumstances (genetics, upbringing, geographical and economic factors) then we all have different "natures" and functioning truly freely in society is impossible. That bit about Human Nature is what always really gets me. I've mostly established that we are egoistic by nature but I come back around to think of it and everytime I come out defeated. What do you think about that, regardless of my ethical dilemma? I think to solve it, anarchism is best executed at a small scale, in individual communes with their own interests. Although if we are truly egoistic by nature, I see issues arising, so I guess we're back at the start! Haha! It's tricky, isn't it? You don't sound naive, friend, you're learning. And your points are rational. I've just been very radicalised over the years and I will refute anything for the sake of debate and discussion. I'm really passionate about this indeed, and many other things of this sort, so I'm happy you've reached out! My only question I've already posed, what do you think about human nature? I know you've said that bit about determinism, but I encourage you to elaborate with confidence.

That is wonderful to hear, my friend. If you ever need any study material or want recommendations, feel free to reach out to me. I'm very invested in pure Literature this year as it's consumed most of my work -- but I still dabble in Philosophy whenever I'm free. That bit about Camus rings true for me as well. I think a lot of people can find his notion relatable because in the end, it is true! It proves the truth of his ideals. Although yes, holding Absurdism as an ideologic truth is better than utilising it as a coping mechanism. Your questions are very thought-provoking. This year I've gotten acquainted with Lorca and his generation on a much deeper and biographical level, and I think I've assimilated a lot of his thought. That I think would be perhaps too abstract to put into words, at least in English, but I've found a lot of solace in his thoughts about death, politics and whatnot. I don't mean to go on a ramble, particularly since I don't think I could accurately describe my feelings about it in any language other than Spanish! Apologies. Aside from that, I've been reading Spinoza rather inconsistently this year and I'm... interested in his notion. It's very... determinist, which I worry about, but it's very freeing also, in a sense. It treats Ethics as Epistemology and, as a teacher, I really like that. For more politics, I've always been a very radical Stirnerite. I still am, but I'm learning to open up, and that's caused me to inevitably drift toward Spinoza (and also, Marx). The "nature of the world" is elusive to me in the strict sense. If by "nature of the world" you mean "nature of man" (or rather, pursuit of man), I'd say "freedom". Freedom is all I think, all I read, all I write. I search for it always, and I think a lof of ideologies stem from the need for freedom rather than an actual solid ideal or pursuit of something transcendentally ethical. Either way, if I had to sum my current thoughts into a sentence or two, it'd be these: "The highest activity a human being can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand is to be free." - B. Spinoza. "I love men too — not merely individuals, but every one. But I love them with the consciousness of egoism; I love them because love makes me happy, I love because loving is natural to me, because it pleases me. I know no “commandment of love.”" - M. Stirner.

Saturday! What a marvelous surprise. I'm so glad to see you. I'm doing well. I think leaving Spring sites has helped me prioritise what's important this year ‐ granted, I think I'd be too busy for them anyway. Regardless I miss you and my other friends sometimes. How are you? How is that wonderfully avid curiosity of yours? How are things over there with you all? What have you been reading lately? I hope you know I'll always be interested in catching up with you or Doc or anyone else. I'll counter-fact your fact: Did you know that Lorca became affiliated with the Association of Friends of the USSR? He developed socialist ideals after travelling to New York (way worse back then) and seeing the racism and classism. He has an entire book which is mostly dedicated to African-American culture and denouncing the cold, capitalist, racist and industrialised city that constrained it socioculturally (he mostly lived around Harlem at the time), it's called Poet in New York.

Gotcha, I sent a FRQ!

Thank you! And yes of course, my full URL list is at https://rentry.co/6bichwpg -- let me know if you'd be interested in anything else. Otherwise I'll reach out to you on Discord in 2-3 days!

Hello! You have really nice URLs, unfortunately I'm particularly picky with /Voyeur and don't really see anything I'd use more! I do like /Ministry though so feel totally free to re-offer or offer for another URL at some other point... I may change my mind!

Hello! I don't really see anything at this time but your URL deco is super cute! Feel free to re-offer at any time.

Hi, friend! That's totally fine, I'm so glad to see other people appreciating what I do haha. I don't know if you like to read more prose or verse so I will recommend you a few off the top of my head, but feel free to ask for more later as I've been very busy teaching about much older Literature in these last school trimesters haha. - Mario Benedetti (verse). Uruguayan as is Galeano, and while he also often deals with more sentimental topics, politics isn't extent. - Eduardo Mendoza (prose, novel). Spanish. His novels are mainly crime novels, but also deal with history and politics, specially regarding 20th century Catalonia! (All his books are based in Catalonia). Some of his works may remind you of Kafka's "The Trial". These are two that I'm the most aware about at the moment as I've read their work very recently. But if you're interested, most of Spain's "Generación del '27/'98" are very nice. Miguel de Unamuno, Miguel Hernández, Antonio Machado, Rafael Alberti (<- him and his wife were very Marxist btw and I recommend reading about their personal life from a biographical standpoint), the usual suspects. Not very original, sorry! Just what I had on my mind right now. Thank you for your interest, I'm glad to find other people in their early-mid 20s as well! Have a wonderful day as well. 🤍